΢΢²ÝÊÓÆµ

΢΢²ÝÊÓÆµ
Top

Single Assessment Framework version

All services - change

GO Online: Inspection toolkit

Print this page

Safeguarding

People need to feel safe and safeguarding people is central to good quality care. It’s important that regulated providers understand what feeling safe means to the people you support.

The following film provides a summary of this area of inspection. It can help you and your teams learn about what will be inspected and what is important to demonstrate to deliver good or outstanding care.

Introducing Safeguarding

Duration 02 min 43 sec

The ΢΢²ÝÊÓÆµ focus on Safe begins by looking at how your service protects people from avoidable harm.

They’ll be wanting to know that you are consistent in how you protect people … and that your staff is trained, capable and confident to discuss Safeguarding with people.

This will require you to demonstrate how you engage with people and better understand what safe means to them, putting into practice what is needed to meet their needs.

The ΢΢²ÝÊÓÆµ will want to know there is Safeguarding expertise in your organisation, which might mean higher levels of training for your managers or Champions, as well as looking at how you connect with local experts, such as Safeguarding Teams.

You will be expected to deliver person-centred care that protects people from bullying, harassment, abuse, discrimination, avoidable harm, and neglect.

Your safeguarding policies and procedures will need to reflect the latest legislation and guidance. Keep them regularly reviewed and effectively communicated. This is equally true for your Whistleblowing policies.

Continue to monitor how you are performing in regard to Safeguarding, looking for opportunities to improve. Where problems are identified, clearly record the issues and what actions were taken to resolve them.

In advance of their monitoring and inspection, the ΢΢²ÝÊÓÆµ will be looking at the notifications and safeguarding alerts that have been raised by your service. Be prepared to discuss these with the inspectors, including what actions were taken.

The ΢΢²ÝÊÓÆµ inspector may choose to interview people, family, friends, and relatives. They’ll also want to speak to managers and staff.

The inspectors may choose to observe how your staff engage and interact with people, looking at how safety and safeguarding is supported.

The ΢΢²ÝÊÓÆµ inspectors may ask to review or view examples of the following:

safeguarding records, including alerts and investigations

notifications

complaints and compliments

and staff training and induction records.

So please take a look at the recommendations, examples, and resources in GO Online to help you to meet or exceed ΢΢²ÝÊÓÆµ Safeguarding expectations.

Practical examples

The examples below provide insight into how other Good or Outstanding rated services are succeeding in this area of inspection. Use the filter to choose different types of examples or select based on related prompt.

If you have an example you would like to share, please e-mail employer.engagement@skillsforcare.org.uk.

Filter by resource type


8 example(s) found

Embedding making safeguarding personal

The service embedded the principles of Making Safeguarding Personal, ensuring people's views, experiences and preferences were at the heart of safeguarding decisions. Staff worked closely with individuals to understand what feeling safe meant to them and tailored support to reflect their personal goals and circumstances. For example, people were supported to build confidence and develop strategies to access the community safely. Where appropriate, thorough risk assessments and agreed safety plans enabled people to go out independently while managing potential risks. This personalised approach balanced safeguarding with positive risk-taking, promoting independence, dignity and choice without compromising people's safety.

Read more about this service .

Care provider: Catherine Tam Agency

  • Case study

Date published: July 2026


Using the Herbert Protocol to keep people safe

The service proactively used the Herbert Protocol to help protect people who were at increased risk of going missing. Staff worked with one person and their relative to complete the protocol, ensuring key information such as a recent photograph, medical details, favourite places and daily routines was readily available. This meant that, if the person went missing, the police could immediately access essential information and begin searching without delay. By adopting this nationally recognised approach, the service demonstrated a proactive commitment to safeguarding, helping to reduce risk while supporting people to maintain their independence as safely as possible.

Read more about this service .

Care provider: JCT ΢΢²ÝÊÓÆµ Care Consulting Ltd Trading as Visiting Angels West Leicestershire

  • Case study

Date published: June 2026


Personalising safeguarding to promote independence

The service took a highly personalised approach to safeguarding, ensuring people felt safe in ways that reflected their individual experiences, preferences and past trauma. Rather than applying standardised approaches, the management team developed bespoke, choice-led risk assessments that balanced positive risk-taking with protection from harm. For example, staff worked with one person to identify strategies that reduced potential triggers for trauma and distress while travelling. This enabled the person to continue accessing the services, facilities and activities of their choice safely, demonstrating how safeguarding was used to promote independence and wellbeing rather than unnecessarily restricting people's lives.

Read more about the service .

Care provider: The Old Orchard

  • Case study

Date published: June 2026


Reducing restrictive practices through personalised support

The service supported every person to reduce their reliance on restrictive practices by using personalised, proactive approaches that promoted independence and emotional wellbeing. One person had previously required mechanical restraint because they engaged in serious self-harming behaviours when distressed. Through the staff team's detailed understanding of the person's sensory needs, consistent communication and calm, person-centred approach, they were able to identify and respond to the underlying causes of distress. As a result, the person no longer harmed themselves and no longer required mechanical restraint to keep them safe. This demonstrated how understanding the individual and meeting their unmet needs could significantly reduce restrictions while improving safety, dignity and quality of life.

Read more about this service .

Care provider: Your Support

  • Case study

Date published: April 2026


Safeguarding through learning and action

The registered manager and staff team showed great commitment to ensuring people were safe and any concerns raised were fully reviewed. Safeguarding concerns were investigated to the highest standard in a systematic and detailed manner, ensuring every single part of the allegation was responded to in detail.

As part of their exceptional approach to safeguarding the registered manager was not afraid to report concerns to the police to ensure thoroughness and that nothing was missed. In addition to reviewing safeguarding concerns, the registered manager ensured systems and processes relating to any concerns were fully reviewed with staff to ensure potential lessons were learnt.

The registered manager had logs and records that showed appropriate action had been taken where necessary. The management team have fully embedded a culture of safeguarding people through learning. There were many case studies that demonstrated the teams go above and beyond to assess, review and improve outcomes for people. This was not just limited to care needs but also included case studies on staff induction, communication and dining.

Read more about this service .

Care provider: Manor Lodge

  • Case study

Date published: September 2024


Experienced leaders

Leaders were experienced in investigating safeguarding incidents and taking action to help ensure people were protected from abuse. A range of initiatives were in place, alongside appropriate training, to help ensure an open and transparent culture where people and staff could feel confident to raise any concerns.

Leaders promoted people’s consent and choices in their care and understood the principles of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) but had not needed to complete any mental capacity assessments themselves to inform people’s care plans. Staff had been trained and understood how to identify indicators of potential abuse and what actions to take to help promote people’s safety. Staff consistently felt their managers would take the right actions to safeguard people if they went to them with any concerns. Staff promoted people’s decision making and provided them with choices over their care.

Read more about this service .

Care provider: Just a Little Company

  • Case study

Date published: July 2024


Safeguarding training with documented referrals

Staff had received training in safeguarding and there was an up-to-date safeguarding policy in place. The organisation had followed safeguarding procedures and made referrals to the local authority as well as notifying the Care Quality Commission when required. Records showed referrals, investigation details and outcomes with action plans where required.

In care homes, and some hospitals, this is usually through MCA application procedures called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) We found the service was working within the principles of the MCA and if needed, appropriate legal authorisations were in place to deprive a person of their liberty. The documentation supported that each DoLS application was decision specific for that person. For example, regarding restrictive practices such as locked doors, sensor mats and bed rails. We saw that the conditions of the DoLS had been met.

Read more about this service .

Care provider: Arlington House

  • Case study

Date published: June 2024


Independent whistleblowing helpline

The provider had introduced a dedicated separate whistle blowing line with an independent company with a 24-hour phone line, to encourage staff, visitors and people to come forward with any concerns. Posters had been displayed in offices and in newsletters and correspondence about this.

Read more about this service .

Care provider: Avenues South East

  • Case study

Date published: November 2022



Developed in partnership with